Relationship of Teacher-Student Interaction, Learning Commitment and Student Learning Comfort at Secondary Level

Authors

  • Zill-e-Huma Siddique M.Phil. Scholar, Institution of Education and Research (IER), University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Sabir Hussain Ph.D. Scholar, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Shahzad Ahmad M.Phil. Scholar, Institution of Education and Research (IER), University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Saddam Hussain M.Phil Scholar, English literature and linguistics, BZU Multan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53575/irjei.v3.02(22)17.156-169

Keywords:

teacher-student interaction, learning commitment, learning comfort

Abstract

For efficient teaching and learning, students and teachers place great importance on a calm and comfortable classroom environment. The classroom's learning environment may increase teachers' and students' comfort and productivity. Furthermore, learning should be comfortable since pain might deter pupils from being motivated to study. Therefore, the demands of instructors, students, and learning activities to encourage learning commitment should be met in the classroom. The investigation was carried out in the Sheikhupura and Lahore districts of secondary schools. The survey comprised all public secondary school pupils in Lahore and Sheikhupura. The sample was chosen using a multistage sampling method. First, 20 public secondary schools in the Lahore and Sheikhupura districts were chosen using a stratified random sample approach. Then, using a cluster sampling technique, 400 respondents in class 10 were chosen from the same public secondary schools. Finally, 18 observations were made using the "Teacher-Student Interaction Scale" to evaluate the teacher-student interactions. To measure teacher-student interaction, learning commitment, and students' comfort with learning, data were gathered using the "Teacher-Student Interaction Inventory Scale," "Learning Commitment Inventory," and "Learning Comfort Inventory." The instrument's dependability, as determined by the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient, was 0.83. The Pearson correlation coefficient and independent-sample t-test were used to examine the data. The research revealed good trends in the amount of teacher-student engagement, student learning commitment, and comfort with learning.

Additionally, there was a connection between student-teacher relationships, adequacy of learning commitment, and comfort with learning. Additional research revealed a substantial difference between the genders in the mean level of cordial interaction between students and teachers. Additionally, data indicated a statistically significant gender difference in the mean of students' emotional commitment.

Author Biography

Sabir Hussain, Ph.D. Scholar, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Research scholar

References

Ahmad, C. N. C., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2013). Physical and psycho-social aspects of the learning environment in the science laboratory and their relationship to teacher satisfaction. Learning Environ Research, 16(102), 367–385.

Ahmad, C. N. C., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2014). The establishment of physical aspects of science laboratory environment inventory. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(2), 123-136.

Ahmad, C. N. C., Shaharim, S. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2017). Teacher-Student Interactions, Learning Commitment, Learning Environment and Their Relationship with Student Learning Comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 14(1), 57-72.

Barnitt, H. (2003). Lighting for the future. Building Services Journal: The Magazine for the CIBSE, 25(1), 38-39.

Bartlett, B. A. (2003). Blogging to learn. Knowledge Tree E-Journal. Retrieved from: http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edtion04/pdf/Blogging_olearn.pdf

Basey, J., Sackett, L., & Robinson, N. (2008). Optimal science lab design: Various components of lab design impact students in the lab. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1-15.

Bucholz, J. L., & Sheffler, J. L. (2009). Creating a warm and inclusive classroom environment: Planning for all children to feel welcome. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(4), 1-14.

Burrows, P. L. (2010). An examination of the relationship among affective, cognitive, behavioral, and academic factors of student engagement of 9th-grade students (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Oregon. The Graduate School of the University of Oregon: Oregon.

Covell, K., McNeil, J. K., & Howe, R. B. (2009). Reducing teacher burnout by increasing student engagement: A children’s rights approach. Journal of School Psychology International, 30(78), 282-290.

Da Grac, V. A. C., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Petreche, J. R. D. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimization of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of The State Sao Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(62), 984-999.

Dallimore, E. J., Platt, M., & Hertenstein, J. H. (2008). Class participation in accounting courses: Relationship among preparation, frequency, comfort, and learning. AAA 2009 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper.

Douglas, J. A., Douglas, A., McClelland, R. J., & Davies, J. (2015). Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 329-349.

Ergin, ?., Kanli, U., & Ünsal, Y. (2008). An example of the effect of the 5E model on the academic success and attitude levels of students: Inclined projectile motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 47-59.

Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Soerjaningsih, W. (2010). Instructor-student interpersonal interaction and student outcomes at the university level in Indonesia. The Open Education Journal, 3(2), 21–33.

Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Torchetti, L., & Buholzer, A. (2017). Competitive classroom norms and exclusion of children with academic and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 1-11.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update (3rded.). Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.

Ghafouri, F. (2014). Close encounters with nature in an urban kindergarten: A study of learners' inquiry and experience. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(13), 54-76.

Godlesky, L. E. (2018). Examining teacher leadership perception and professional learning community engagement (Doctoral dissertation). Theses and Dissertations. 2544.

Grac, V. A. C., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Petreche, J. R. D. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimization of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of The State Sao Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(200), 984-999.

Greene, M. L., Way, N., & Pahl, K. (2006). Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: Patterns and psychological correlates. Developmental Psychology, 42(191), 218-236.

Hertzberger, H. (2008). Behaviorism for new psychology: what was wrong with behaviorism and what is wrong with it now. Behaviour and Philosophy, 32(2), 5-12.

Hill, M. C., & Epps, K. K. (2010). The impact of physical classroom environment on student satisfaction and student evaluation of teaching in the university environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 65-79.

Hoang, T. N. (2008). The effect of grade level, gender and ethnicity on attitude and learning environment in mathematics in high school. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(31), 48-59.

Kamaruzzaman, K., & Tazilan, A. S. M. (2013). Thermal comfort assessment of a classroom in tropical climate conditions. Recent Advances in Energy, Environment & Development, 30(1), 87-91.

Khan, P., & Iqbal, M. (2012). Role of physical facilities in the teaching-learning process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(3), 210- 218.

Koç, M. (2005). A critical literature review is an implication of learning theories for effective technology integration and pre-service teacher training. Journal of Turkis Science Education, 2(1), 2-18.

Krejie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Marzita, P., Mazlini, A., Mohd, H. I., Noraini, M. N., & Nidzam, C. A. C. (2014). An analysis of comfortable teaching and learning environment: Community response to climate change in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(116), 285-290.

Myint, S. K., & Atputhasamy, L. (2005). Self-perceived and students’ perceptions of teacher interaction in the classrooms. Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy; Research, Policy, Practice, Singapore, 30 May - 1 June.

Nihra, M., Said, H. S., & Kuppusamy, C. (2012). Hubungan sikap (komitmen, emosi, berwawasan) dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar PKPG (SPT, SPN, SPH) tahun akhir di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Skudai. Journal of Educational, 6(56), 74-91.

O'Connor, E. (2010). Teacher-child relationships as dynamic systems. Journal of School Psychology, 48(92), 187-218.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M. P. R. Pintrich, & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451?502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Said, M. N. H. M., & Kuppusamy, C. (2012). Hubungan sikap (komitmen, emosi, berwawasan) dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar PKPG (SPT, SPN, SPH) tahun akhir di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Skudai. Journal of Education, 6(29), 74-91.

Siegel, P. M. (2003). Where innovation matters, IT matters. Educause Review, 38(6), 96-97.

Solas, E. C., & Wilson, K. (2015). Lessons learned and strategies used while teaching core-curriculum science courses to English language learners at a Middle Eastern university. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(2), 81-94.

Somayeh, G., Mostafa, J. S., & Azizollah, A. (2013). Investigating the effect of positive

Telli, S., Brok, P. D., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in secondary schools: Development of a Turkish version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environ Research, 10(9), 115-129.

Veal, W. R., & Jackson, Z. (2005). Developing a primary science methods classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Educations, 4(20), 195-213.

Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership (Alexandria, VA), 41(8), 19 -27.

Weilin, C., Guoguang, C., Jung, H. P., Qin, O., & Yingxin, Z., (2013). Influence of indoor air temperature on human thermal comfort, motivation and performance. Building and Environment, 68(13), 114-122.

Wonglorsaichon, B., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). The influence of students’ school engagement on learning achievement: A structural equation modeling analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12(116), 1748-1755.

Wrenn, J., & Wrenn, B. (2009). Enhancing learning by integrating theory and practice. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 258-265.

Zakaria, S., Ahmad, M. I., & Noranizah, Y. (2012). Social, environmental factors and their relation to identity formation. Journal of Hadhari Special Edition, 12(51), 155-172.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-12

How to Cite

Siddique, Z.- e-H., Hussain, S., Ahmad, M. S., & Hussain, S. (2022). Relationship of Teacher-Student Interaction, Learning Commitment and Student Learning Comfort at Secondary Level. International Research Journal of Education and Innovation, 3(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.53575/irjei.v3.02(22)17.156-169

Most read articles by the same author(s)