Impact of Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Students Academic Achievement in the Subject of General Science at Elementary Level


  • Madiha Shafiq MPhil scholar Northern University Nowshehra
  • Neelma Hassan MPhil scholar Northern University Nowshehra.
  • Nazia Liaqat MPhil scholar Northern University Nowshehra.
  • Dr. Muhammad Naeemullah HOD Education Northern University Nowshehra.



Reciprocal Teaching Strategy, Academic Achievement, Elementary Level


The study aimed at examining the effect of reciprocal teaching strategy on students’ academic achievement in the subject of general science at elementary level. The objectives of the study were; (i) to investigate the effect of using reciprocal teaching strategy on academic achievement of 5th grade students, (ii) To investigate the effect of reciprocal teaching strategy on high achiever and low achiever of 5th grade, (iii) To observe the participation of the students in reciprocal teaching strategy. Sample of the study was consisting of 40 students studying general science in class 5th. A Pre-test Post- test equivalent group design was used to conduct the study. For collection of data teachers made test and observation sheets were developed. Statistical techniques such t-test, percentage, S.D and mean were used to analyze the collected data. The study is equally significant for students, teachers, curriculum developers and future researchers. It was found that the participation of students was significant in reciprocal teaching strategy during treatment. The participation of students in reciprocal teaching strategy reported an increasing trend after the first week to week 6.With the help of reciprocal teaching strategy students readiness to learn, their attention to reading and listening, their ability to generate questions from the text, their activeness during the discussion and their confidence about sharing their ideas in a group increased hundred percent. Reciprocal teaching had great effect on student’s academic achievement.


Armbrister, A. L. (2010). Non-native speakers reach higher ground: A study of reciprocal teaching's effects on English language learners. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.

Diehl, H. L. (2005). The effects of the reciprocal teaching framework on strategy acquisition of fourth-grade struggling readers. West Virginia University.

DiLorenzo, K. E. (2010). The effects of reciprocal teaching on the science literacy of intermediate elementary students in inclusive science classes. Florida Atlantic University.

Ekine, A. (2013). Enhancing girls’ participation in science in Nigeria. Improving Learning Opportunities and Outcomes for Girls in Africa, 41(3), 12-26.

Farooq. R. A., & Tabassum. R. (2017). Understanding research in education’Pakistan Lahore. Majeed Book Depot.

Hashey, J. M., & Connors, D. J. (2003). Learn from our journey: Reciprocal teaching action research. The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 224-232.

Koul, M.L. (2007). Effective classroom processes at elementary stage and quality education under SSA. New Delhi. Effective_ Classroom.

Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 91-106.

Magnuson, K. A. (2009). The impact of reciprocal teaching on first grade students. Southwest Minnesota State University.

Manohar, U. (2008). Reciprocal teaching strategies.

Myers, P. A. (2005). The princess storyteller, Clara Clarifier, Quincy Questioner, and the Wizard: Reciprocal teaching adapted for kindergarten students. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 314-324.

Nagle, L. (2012). The role of self-efficacy in students' reading enjoyment through reciprocal teaching. St Mary's College of California.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension? fostering and comprehension?monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Pilonieta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). A case study on reciprocal teaching for at elementary level of students: “We can do it, too!” Journal for Teachers Reading, 61(1), 121-130.

Ramos, J. A. (2012). Ameliorating the English Reading Comprehension of Spanish-Speaking ELLs through a Reciprocal Teaching Intervention. ProQuest LLC.

Rose, M. (2014). Why school?: Reclaiming education for all of us. The New Press.

Takala, M. (2006). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension in mainstream and special (SLI) education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational 33(1), 40-41.

Weedman, D. L., & Weedman, M. C. (2001). When questions are the answer. Principal Leadership, 2(2), 42-46.

Williams, J. A. (2010). Taking on the role of questioner: Revisiting reciprocal teaching. Reading Teacher, 64(4), 278-281.

Zaitoun, H. (2003). Strategies of teaching: A modern view of learning/teaching methods. Cairo, Alam AlKotob.




How to Cite

Shafiq, M., Hassan, N., Liaqat, N., & Naeemullah, D. M. (2021). Impact of Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Students Academic Achievement in the Subject of General Science at Elementary Level. International Research Journal of Education and Innovation, 2(3), 139–153.