Examining the Relationship Between Having a Dedicated Study Space at Home and Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Anees ul Husnain Shah Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore, D.G Khan Campus
  • Sabir Hussain Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Dr. Aijaz Ali Khoso Assistant Professor, University of Sufism & Modern Sciences, Bhitshah, Sindh.

Keywords:

Dedicated study space, academic performance, secondary education, learning environment, socioeconomic influences, family involvement, study habits

Abstract

The objective of this research was to establish a connection between the existence of a specific place for studying in the house and the secondary school student's academic success. This research was correlational and quantitative. The 10th-grade students were randomly selected from Male Public Secondary Schools in Tehsil Muzaffargarh District Dera Ghazi Khan. There were 340 male Rural and Urban Public Secondary School students. The results showed that although a dedicated study area is strongly associated with academic performance, the relationship is more complex than previously appreciated. Providing a study space does not automatically result in better outcomes; rather, it is dependent on the quality of the environment, potential distractions, socioeconomic challenges, and family dynamics. The findings focus on the use of a holistic approach that integrates good study environments, active family support, equitable resource access, and strategies to establish effective study habits. Insights from these studies provide valuable recommendations for educators, parents, and policymakers working on improving student success through enhanced learning conditions.

References

Ahmed, A. A. (2021). The role of environmental factors in student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 245-260. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5018158

Baker, A., Fernandez, C., & Colvin, J. (2018). The paradox of study environments: Balancing structure and adaptability. Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1449956

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Motivation and self-determination in education: Recent advancements. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 45-62.

Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x

Evans, G. W. (2021). Socio-economic influences on child development: A review of environmental factors. Developmental Psychology, 58(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000622

Evans, G. W., Saltzman, H., & Cooperman, J. L. (2010). Housing quality and children’s socioemotional health. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509334282

Gutman, L. M., & Feinstein, L. (2021). Socio-economic status and its impact on learning environments. Education Research Review, 34(2), 100-112.

Jensen, E. (2013). Engaging students with poverty in mind: Practical strategies for raising achievement. ASCD.

Maxwell, L. E. (2016). School building condition, social climate, student attendance and academic achievement: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.009

Phillips, M. (2019). The role of family support in academic achievement: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Education Research, 112(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1674267

Shen, L. (2021). The changing landscape of home learning environments post-COVID-19. Educational Research and Practice, 19(3), 487-502.

Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417

Smith, J., Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). Cognitive and psychological benefits of dedicated study spaces in secondary education. Educational Insights, 51(4), 310-328.

Sundstrom, E., Town, J. P., Rice, R. W., Osborn, D. P., & Brill, M. (1994). Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600204

Sweller, J. (2021). Cognitive load theory: A modern perspective. Cognitive Science Journal, 48(1), 1-20.

Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). Challenges in remote education: The role of home environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 154-172.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Shah, D. M. A. ul H. ., Hussain, S. ., & Khoso, D. A. A. . (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Having a Dedicated Study Space at Home and Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement. International Research Journal of Education and Innovation, 2(3), 337–345. Retrieved from https://irjei.com/index.php/irjei/article/view/218

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>