Perception of Head Teachers regarding the Current practices of Monitoring and Evaluation at Primary School Level in District Kech Balochistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53575/irjei.v3.02(22)12.114-120Keywords:
Perception, Head Teachers, Monitoring, Evaluation, Primary School LevelAbstract
The purpose of the study was to find out the Perception of Head Teachers regarding the current practices of monitoring and evaluation at Primary School Level in District Kech Balochistan. It was quantitative study. The nature of the study was descriptive and survey type. The population is comprised of 85 primary Schools heads, DEO and Divisional Directors of Primary School Level in District Kech Balochistan. There are total 92 Girls and Boys Secondary School in Kech. Pilot testing was done in 10 schools out of 92. Questionnaire was used as research tool. Tool development is a most important part of the study. In this process, experts was consulted and previous research and appropriate literature was studied and reviewed to construct the tool. For collecting data, questionnaire used as data collection tools. The five point rating scale as strongly agree, disagree, not sure, agree and strongly disagree was used to collect data. It was improved in consultation with the experts in the field and through pilot testing by head teachers of secondary schools. The reliability of these tools were calculated through SPSS. After finalizing and pilot testing, the questionnaire was distributed to the respondent for collecting data. The questionnaires were served through postage, email by hand in face-to-face meeting by the researcher to the respondent. The questionnaire was scrutinized for errors and omission, ambiguity and relevance. The reliability was calculated through SPSS (Version, 24) by using Cronbach Alpha. The data obtained through questionnaires and observations were interpreted and analyzed by using, Chi square, percentage and mean.
References
ABD, World Bank. (2004). Devolution in Pakistan - an assessment and recommendation for action.
Abu-Duhou, I. (1999). School-Based Management. Paris: UNESCO. International Institute for Educational Planning.
Ahmad, E. (2018). Local service provision in selected OECD countries: Do decentralized operations work better? IMP Working Paper (WP/08/67). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Brauckmann, A. and Pashiardis, B., (2019). Decision Making Process in the Decentralized Educational System’ Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 37–42.
Borman, G., Hewes, G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125.
O'Mahon, K. M., & Garavan, S. R. (2012). Finding, supporting, and keeping the role of the principal in teacher. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 37 -63.
Creswell, J., & Plano, C.V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2ndEd). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 945–1017.
Government of Pakistan. (PSLM, 2011). Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (PSLM) (2010-2011).Statistics Division, .Islamabad: Federal Bureau of Statistics.
Khan, E., & B. Fatima. (2019). what’s Decentralization Got to Do with Learning? The Case of Nicaragua’s School Autonomy Reform. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Itolondo, D. A. (2012).The role of coordinators between central and local government. Paper presented at the 2012 Summer Conference of the Korean Association for Public Administration on the challenges of nation development and its strategies, Seoul, Korea.
Memon et al. (2002).Decentralization of the Education System in Sindh; Critical Review” in Research and Policy Dialogues on Key Issues in Education: Decentralization. IED-AKU, Islamabad.
Ngware, J., & Ndirangu, S. (2015). Decentralization and local governments in Kenya. International Studies Programme working paper 08-32. Georgia State University, Atlanta.
National Workshop Report. (2008). Successful Models in Capacity Development for Local Self-Governance towards Urban Renewal & Rural Reconstruction Islamabad, 18 - 19 August 2008 Ministry of Local Government & Rural Development Government of Pakistan.
Njenga, K., & K. Kabiru. (2009). School Councils’ In?uence on School and Classroom Practice. Peabody Journal of Education, vol. 75 (4): 37-65.
Tozoglu, H.F. (2016).Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China'', Journal of Public Economics, 31 May-6 June, Vol. 67, pp. 221-40.
UNESCO. (2006). Decentralization in education in Pakistan .Country report at the UNESCO seminar on “EFA implementation: teacher and resource management in the context of decentralization”. Administrative staff college of India, Hyderabad, India, 6-8 January 2006.
Winkler, D. R. (2015).Understanding decentralization. Retrieved February 20, 2006 fromhttp://www.equip123.net/docs/e2Understanding%20Decentralization.pdf.
Zafar, F, (2003).Fiscal Devolution in Education-Case Study Reflecting Initial Responses, Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Education and UNESCO, Islamabad.
